Legal Opinion
McFarland v. Rogers
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 17, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.
This action of debt was instituted by L. C. Tyler & Sons Co., Inc., in the name of the plaintiff as treasurer of the City of Ellsworth as obligee on a contractor’s bond. It is brought against the principal and surety, and is before us on report on an agreed statement of facts with a stipulation that, if the plaintiff is entitled to recover, judgment shall be entered for the plaintiff for the account of L. C. Tyler & Sons Co., Inc., in the sum of $1,000 with interest from March 1, 1934.
The principal on the bond, Manzie I. Rogers, entered into a contract with the City of Ellworth for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co. v. W. H. Ellis & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Foster v. Kerr & Houston, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- Warner Co. v. SchoonoverCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. SnedegerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Knox Recr. v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Pittsburgh v. Parkview Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Board of Public InstructionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.