Legal Opinion

O'Lea v. O'Lea

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1958No. 2080PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

At the conclusion of all evidence in an uncontested action for an absolute divorce on the ground of voluntary separation for five years, the trial judge, in denying the divorce, made both oral and written findings of fact. Essentially the written finding states that the testimony of the plaintiff and her corroborating witness was “unconvincing.” Standing alone we are unable to determine whether this finding is directed to the credibility of the witnesses or to the sufficiency of their testimony. Considered in conjunction with the oral findings the confusion is compounded,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Sibert v. EllisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Utley v. UtleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Smith v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Butler v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Sheridan v. SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. O'Meara v. O'MearaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API