Sibert v. Ellis

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This case arose out of an automobile collision in an uncontrolled intersection. Trial was had without a jury and at the conclusion of the testimony the court made a general finding for the plaintiff.

In appealing defendant argues that the trial court should have made findings of fact and stated its conclusions of law, and that a general finding destroys or at least seriously restricts the right of appeal. 1 While we may lend a sympathetic ear to this argument, we can extend only sympathy and not aid. The trial court’s rule 52(b), although patterned.after Federal Rule of…