Legal Opinion

Boike v. Akal Security, Incorporated

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 30, 2019No. 2:17-cv-10109Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION at DETROIT GARY BOIKE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. ) 2:17-cv-10109 v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AKAL SECURITY, INC., ) AND ORDER ) Defendant. ) ) ) *** Plaintiff Gary Boike was asked by his employer, Defendant Akal Security, Inc., to take a color-vision examination that confirmed what he, his physician, and the federal agency overseeing his position already knew: Boike’s ability to distinguish between certain colors was impaired. The United States Marshals Service, pursuant to its contract with Defendant Akal Security,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API