Bliss v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is a second appeal. In 1983 the appellants Charles and Sharon Bliss, husband and wife, were separately charged with the rape of Sharon’s son, who was seven or eight years old when the acts occurred. The child was Charles’s stepson. The original informations charged each defendant with rape by sexual intercourse or by deviate sexual activity.
The two cases were consolidated before the first trial, at which the jury found each defendant guilty of rape. Upon the first appeal we held that the trial judge had erred in not requiring the prosecutor to file a bill of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chisum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Bliss v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Clayborn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Cokeley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Dandridge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Sharon Anita Bliss v. A.L. Lockhart, Superintendent of the Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Frazier v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.