Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1913No. 4287PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari; from Brooks superior court—Judge Thomas. May 17, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

Upon a former review of this ease (10 Ga. App. 45, 72 S. E. 514) the judgment of the- judge of the superior court, refusing to sustain a certiorari, was reversed. The reversal was expressly ba,sed solely upon the ground that the verdict was without evidence to support it, in that the evidence of the railroad company’s servants rebutted the plaintiff’s prima facie case, which depended on the statutory presumption of negligence arising from and authorized by proof that the injury- in question had been caused by the operation of the defendant’s train. Civil Code, § 2780. In other words, this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neal v. MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Patterson v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Bass Dry Goods Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. BlueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lee v. HutsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
  2. Macon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Connally Realty Co. v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Russell v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Wood v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API