C3, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge.
This order addresses both “Defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings” and “Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings” pending the termination of an on-going grand jury investigation into the activities of plaintiff touching matters postulated in subject complaint.
*660On December 2, 1983, C3, Inc. (C3) filed its complaint in this court seeking to collect $1 million, more or less, allegedly due it pursuant to the terms of contract # DAAB09-77-D-0004. Thereafter, and prior to filing its answer, Defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings was filed on February 21, 1984.
Whil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Peden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Litton Systems, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1978
- Luigi Goldstein, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1978
- C3, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Afro-Lecon, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ampetrol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Afro-Lecon, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987