Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Rucho

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 2014No. 201PA12-2PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

Following the 2010 Decennial Census, the General Assembly of North Carolina enacted redistricting plans for the North Carolina Senate and House of Representatives, and for the North Carolina dis*546tricts for the United States House of Representatives. Plaintiffs challenge the legality of these plans, arguing that they violate the constitutions of the United States and of North Carolina, controlling federal statutes, and applicable decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court of North Carolina. The three-judge panel reviewing the plans unanimously…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. McCroryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  2. Covington v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  3. Dickson v. RuchoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  4. Common Cause v. RuchoDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
  5. Covington v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API