Legal Opinion
New Milford Block & Supply Corp. v. N. Grondahl & Sons, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 5, 1999No. AC 17480PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
This is the defendant city of New London’s (city) appeal from the trial court’s $22,319.59 judgment rendered against it in accordance with the report of an attorney trial referee. The city claims that the trial court should not have accepted the referee’s report because it incorrectly (1) relied on a theory of ratification and (2) found ratification without sufficient evidence. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff, New Milford Block and Supply Corporation, initiated this action against the defendants N. Grondahl and Sons, Inc. (Grondahl), the general…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John J. Brennan Construction Corporation, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Gerber & Hurley, Inc. v. CCC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Loomis v. Fifth School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Morning Star Holding Co. v. KostopoulosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lynch v. Donahue, No. Cv 95 0143726 (Jun. 27, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- New Milford Block & Supply Corp. v. N. Grondahl & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999