Allen v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, Chief Justice.
It appears that on August 9, 1892, a number of men, among them the plaintiff, were put to work to repair a span of one of appellee’s bridges. After working two days getting the bridge in shape for trains to pass over it, plaintiff and several others were detached and sent off to work at another point where they remained several days. On the morning of the 17th of August plaintiff resumed work on the bridge. During his absence work had proceeded on the bridge, and the necessary pile bents and permanent cap stringers, ties and rails had been put in. The rails had been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marsh v. HermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by17 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Kelley v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Cisco Oil Mill v. Van GeemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. GillenwaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.