Legal Opinion

Coburn v. . Barnhill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The action of the trial court in holding that the credits, derived from dividends and sale of collateral, entered on the note in suit by the Martin County Savings and Trust Company, after the maker had denied liability and repudiated ownership of the stock' attached as collateral, did not repel the bar of the statute, must be upheld on authority of what was said in Nance v. Hulin, 192 N. C., 665, 135 S. E., 774, where the pertinent decisions are collated and distinguished, with special reference to Bank v. King, 164 N. C., 303, 80 S. E., 251, cited and relied upon by appellant. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nance v. . HulinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Bank v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flowe v. . HartwickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Schiltz v. WokalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API