United States v. Leak
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGierke, Chief Judge
The Government asks us to reinstate a finding of guilty that the lower court reversed as factually insufficient. In my view, the correct answer to this request is the same as the punch line of the old joke about the Maine farmer asked for directions to Millinoeket: You can’t get there from here. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion’s resolution of the first and third specified issues. Because I believe we have no authority to act on a finding that a Court of Criminal Appeals has set aside as factually insufficient, I would not reach the certified issue or the second…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.