Legal Opinion

Birdwell v. Glanz

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 2015No. Case No. 15-CV-304-TCK-PJCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TERENCE C. KERN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are Defendant Robert Bates’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. 36); Defendant Stanley Glanz’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 37); and Defendants Michael Huckeby, Jospeh Byars, and Ricardo Vaca’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 38). These Defendants seek dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 based on misjoinder of Plaintiffs, or, alternatively, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim for relief.

For reasons explained below, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs Robbie Emery Burke and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DirecTV, Inc. v. LetoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Sprint Communications Co. v. Theglobe.com, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
  2. Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. City of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  3. Rucker v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API