Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Bolton

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Judicial settlement of accounts.

1Opinion of the Court

Comstock, S.

The underlying question presented on this accounting is, whether the guardian’s account shall be surcharged with' the sum of $5,200 expended by him in the purchase of a lot and residence for his ward, or shall the latter be treated as representing the purchase money, and a conveyance thereof decreed.

The facts are as follows: At the time of the said purchase the ward Was nearly twenty years of age, possessed of an estate ini money amounting to over $30,000', she was married and kept house with her husband on the premises in question. Having *223there established -a pretty and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lockman v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Horton v. . McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. White v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Forman v. . MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Eckford v. De KayNew York Court of Chancery · 1840

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of VanderbiltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  2. Empire State Surety Co. v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. In re the Accounting of DeckerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1902
  4. Benson v. SiemonsNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Arnstein v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API