Peay v. Durham Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
The real party plaintiff in the case is Mary Hemphill. She charges the defendant with having broken a contract of insurance with intent to defraud her and her son Tom Peay of their interests therein. The policy of insurance is on the life of Tom Peay, and Mary Plemphill is the beneficiary thereunder. Her son Tom Peay was convicted of a felony and sentenced to be confined in the State penitentiary for the period of his natural life. Pie is confined there now. Mary Hemphill had another policy in the same company and policies in other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sutton v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Richardson v. Northwestern R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Milhous v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Planters Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Jeff Hunt Machinery Co. v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Garrett v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.