Elliott v. Caheen Bros.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The cause was tried on counts for malicious prosecution. The trial court gave the affirmative charge, requested in writing, for defendants.
The prosecution was for violation of the Bad Check Law, which, as applicable to this case, reads: “Any person who * * * with intent to defraud shall * * * draw or utter * * * any check * * * upon any bank * * * knowing at the time of such * * * drawing, uttering * * * that the maker or drawer has not sufficient funds in or credit with such bank * * * for the payment of such check * * * although no express representation is made in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McLeod v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Goolsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Molton Realty Co. v. MurchisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Hendrix v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- Carlisle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Birwood Paper Company v. DamskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Gulf States Paper Corp. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Glidden Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.