Legal Opinion

Goolsby v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1925No. 6 Div. 627PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The Act of 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 319) is codified as sections 4158-4160 of the Code of 1923, as rewritten by the recess code committee of the Legislature. In the act and its codification are contained provisions to the effect that upon tbe trial for obtaining money, other property, or credit by check, draft, or order which is not paid, any person so charged shall be a competent witness to testify to his circumstances and intent when he drew the check, draft, or order. Why was the act of 1921 not included in the Code of 1923, rather than the act of 1915?

The act of 1915 was given consideration in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Ex parte HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Piggly Wiggly No. 208, Inc. v. DuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Kendrick v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Tolbert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Stovall v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API