Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided December 27, 1990No. 90-02PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HABHAB, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, for delivery of cocaine. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. We affirm.

Two undercover officers, on duty in a crime area, were approached by defendant, Michael Brown. The officers later testified that Brown offered to sell them drugs, introduced them to his drug supplier, and was in the process of setting up a drug deal when the officers identified themselves and made arrests. Brown denied any intent to set up a drug deal. He claimed that he offered to find the officers a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. State v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. State v. SchrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. United States v. Marie Moses, Alias Marie KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Victor MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. State v. FettersCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997
  4. State v. PhanhsouvanhSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API