Legal Opinion
Estate of Stalkup v. Vancouver Clinic, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 1, 2008No. 35682-1-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
187 P.3d 291 (2008)
The ESTATE of John Dean STALKUP, by and through Susan STALKUP, as Personal Representative, and Susan Stalkup, individually, Respondents,
v.
The VANCOUVER CLINIC, INC., P.S., and James Hampton, M.D., Appellants.
No. 35682-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
July 1, 2008.
Mary H. Spillane, William Kastner & Gibbs, Seattle, WA, Jeffrey Richard Street, Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, for Appellants.
Steven Richard Pruzan, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
¶ 1 The jury in a medical malpractice case returned a special verdict finding that,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Moore v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Moore v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO. GROUPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Espinoza v. American Commerce InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Mears v. Bethel School District No. 403Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.