Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Rhodes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1964No. 8252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Petitioner Westinghouse Electric Corporation applied to this Court for an alternative writ of mandamus setting forth that respondent had denied petitioner’s application for a contractor’s license within the State of Arizona. We accepted jurisdiction, being of the opinion there was no plain, speedy and adequate remedy at law within the meaning of our decision, Rhodes v. Clark, 92 Ariz. 31, 35, 373 P.2d 348, and issued the alternative writ.

Petitioner filed an application for an Arizona State contractor’s license, Class A, B and C-ll. Pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northen v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Visco v. State Ex Rel. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Isley v. School District No. 2 of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rhodes v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold Const. Co., Inc. v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Miller v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Urbatec, a California Corporation v. Yuma County, an Arizona CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API