Deere & Co. v. Wolf
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Adams District Court. — Hon. R. C. Henry, Judge. Action by attachment. The intervenor (a bank) claims certain goods attached. The issues arising upon this claim are involved in this appeal. The cause was tried to a jury, and a judgment had for plaintiffs. The intervenor appeals; The case has before been in this court. See 65 Iowa, 32.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
The cause may be more conveniently disposed of by considering the objections to the judgment as nearly as possible in the order of their discussion by the counsel of intervenor.
I. The intervenor claims to be the absolute and unqualified owner of certain personal property which plaintiff caused to be seized upon an attachment in this case. This claim of ownership is based upon a transfer by the defendant to the intervenor of property of considerable value, in payment of an indebtedness from defendant to the intervenor. Plaintiffs claim that this transfer is void, for the reason that it was…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ChristieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Peterson v. McManusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Kidd v. American Pill & Medicine Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Churchill v. GronewigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Mattes v. EngelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902