Lawrence v. Shaw
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
The judgment in this case was predicated upon the affirmative answer to each of the questions presented to the Court on the facts agreed. If these answers were correct, the judgment must be affirmed; otherwise, the judgment must be reversed, or modified.
Affirmative answers to the first and second questions are in accord with the decision of this Court in Martin v. Guilford County, 201 N. C., 63, 158 S. E., 847, 76 L. R. A., 978, and with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Trotter v. State of Tennessee, 290 U. S., 354, 78 L. Ed., 368.
The question presented in Martin v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Trotter v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McIntosh v. AubreySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Chicago Theological Seminary v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State ex rel. Smith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- In re the Assessment of Additional Income Taxes & Interest against Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958