Legal Opinion

Herrera v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1957No. Civ. 22387PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Four personal injury actions and one action for wrongful death were consolidated for trial and are presented together upon appeal. The appeals are taken from judgments entered upon verdicts directed for defendant.

There is no claim here that there was contributory negligence and the sole question is sufficiency of the evidence to warrant a reasonable inference of negligence on defendant’s part.

As the test of power to direct a verdict is the same as that for nonsuit, this court must accept as true ail direct and indirect evidence favorable to plaintiff and reject that opposed to it. (Estate of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Campbell v. MaganaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Bilyeu v. Standard Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Koch v. Southern Pacific CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Dillenbeck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API