Legal Opinion

People v. McCall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 24, 1989No. 2—87—1210, 2—87—1211 consPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis

Following a jury trial, defendants, Jerry and Nick McCall, were convicted of armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2(a)). Jerry was adjudged a habitual criminal pursuant to the Habitual Criminal Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 33B — 1 et seq.) and sentenced to natural-life imprisonment. Nick was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment. Defendants brought separate appeals from their convictions, and we consolidated the appeals for oral argument and disposition. Nick contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of another crime and further alleges that he was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. SlimIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. TillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. McTushIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MontefolkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. CosmeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. People v. UtleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. People v. DuniganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API