Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1975No. 12167PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
A petition for special action was filed by the Gila County Attorney with the concurrence of the Attorney General. He alleges that the respondent judge failed to comply with the provisions of Rule 20, 1973 Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., and thereby abused his discretion. Rule 20 reads as follows:
“On motion of a defendant or on its own initiative, the court shall enter a judgment of acquittal of one or more offenses charged in an indictment, information, or complaint after the evidence on either side is closed or immediately after the verdict of the jury, if there is no substantial…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State v. SabalosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- State ex rel. Hyder v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.