Legal Opinion
Arizona v. Manypenny
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 15, 1981No. 79-621PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
451 U.S. 232 (1981)
ARIZONA
v.
MANYPENNY.
No. 79-621.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 10, 1980.
Decided April 21, 1981.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Daniel Jesse Smith argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Stephen D. Neely.
James D. Whitney argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · BlackmunJustice Blackmun
Respondent, a federal officer, was charged in Arizona with the commission of a state crime. On the officer's motion, the case was removed from state court and tried in federal court. The issue presented is whether a federal appellate…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
3Cases cited50 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017