Legal Opinion
Wildermuth v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 17, 1952No. 10448_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
By this action, brought under the Tucker Act, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (2), plaintiffs sought to recover the sum of $9,-795, claimed to be due for architectural services rendered under a contract of employment by the United States executed on April 6, 1942.
On March 2, 1942, the President, having officially ascertained that an acute shortage of school facilities existed in Calumet Township, Lake County, Indiana, advised the Federal Works Administrator that use of federal funds had been approved for construction of a 10 room school house, at that location, for an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Matter of the Estate of Van B. Hooper, Deceased. The Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Halvorson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1954
- College of the Virgin Islands v. Vitex Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1966
- Reese v. Government Of The Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Reese v. Government of Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.