Legal Opinion

Olson v. Johnson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The appellant contends that there are two separate complaints attached to one summons. It is the respondents’ position that the plaintiffs’ pleading consists of but one complaint in which two causes of action are separately stated. The wife’s cause of action is set forth in paragraph form. It is particularized as to the following items:

Paragraph “1.” Residence of plaintiffs, their status as husband and wife, and occupation of Dorothy M. Olson as housewife.

Paiagraph “2.” Residence of defendant Johnson and assertion that his occupation is unknown.

Paragraph “3.” Corporate status and residence of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weber v. NaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Palmisano v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hall v. FrankelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ewing v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stromsted v. St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan SistersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Stromsted v. St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan SistersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API