Legal Opinion

Young v. Luria

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 10, 1923No. 24159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received in a collision between two automobiles at a street crossing. Plaintiff was a guest in one of the cars, and, of course, cannot be held responsible for the negligence of the driver. See Cuneo v. N. O. Ry. & L. Co., 147 La. 1012, 86 South. 477. But to recover of defendant she must show negligence in the defendant or his agents.

We have carefully considered the record, in which the issue is mainly one of fact, and cannot disagree with the findings of the lower court, which we adopt and quote as follows:

“The undisputed 'facts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daull v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lorance v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Lawrason v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Lewis v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
  4. Calamia v. National Hosiery MillsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Lorance v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API