Legal Opinion
Calamia v. National Hosiery Mills
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1935No. 16275PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTERFIELD, Judge.
Plaintiff, Mrs. Laura Vachetta, brought this suit against Gilbert Berard and the National Hosiery Mills, claiming $300 as damages for physical injuries alleged to have been caused as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by. Carlo Billo, in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger, and an automobile driven at -the time of the alleged accident by the defendant, Berard. The National Hosiery Mills, which was sued as a corporation, proved to be a partnership, and, upon proper showing to that effect, was dismissed as a party defendant. The case was tried in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daull v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Franz v. ShushanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Synigol v. OuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Welsch v. LaundryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Young v. LuriaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Exchange Ins. Corporation v. CarpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Calamia v. MayerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Calamia v. MyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lotspeich v. Shreveport Rys. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939