Legal Opinion
Moore v. Smith
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 1979No. 2-978-A-316PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Judge.
Harold Smith and James Hoskins filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Mandate. The substance of the complaint alleged that officials of the Indiana Reformatory at Pendleton were not complying with the policy of the Department of Corrections regarding lay advocates. No question was raised at the trial court or argued here that the commitment of either Smith or Hoskins was illegal.
Hoskins, an inmate of the Indiana Reformatory serving a life sentence for first degree murder, was housed in a seclusion unit at the time of and prior to the hearing in the trial court.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKay v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Wabash v. Wabash County Sheriff's DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Butler v. HeffelmireIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990