Legal Opinion
Al-Mansur v. County of Alameda
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 30, 2025No. 3:24-cv-06909Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SABIR AL-MANSUR, Case No. 24-cv-06909-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO 9 v. RECUSE OR DISQUALIFY 10 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 119, 123, 129 Defendants. 11 12 13 Before the Court are Plaintiff Sabir Al-Mansur’s several motions seeking judicial recusal. 14 The motions are fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7- 15 1(b), Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their 16 arguments and the relevant legal authority, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Robert HERNANDEZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.