Legal Opinion

The People v. Mahoney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1935No. 22909. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

Bernard Mahoney was indicted and convicted in the criminal court of Cook county on a charge of embezzling the sum of $713 which he had collected as agent of the complaining witness, Kate Henry, and converted to his own use. A writ of error brings the case here for review.

Mahoney was an attorney with offices in Chicago. Kate Henry turned over to him a $900 judgment note for collection. The note was collected through other attorneys, and a check for $713, representing the collection less certain fees and expenses, was mailed on July 11, 1931, payable to “Bernard J. Mahoney, attorney for Kate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. George v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People Ex Rel. Swanson v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. SingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Harris v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. The People v. HartwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The People v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. The People v. BimboIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Meyer v. HendrixAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API