Legal Opinion

De La Maria v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided July 8, 1985No. Civ. A. C83-852APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF COURT

MOYE, Chief Judge.

The above-styled action is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. After an exhaustive review of over 200 pages of briefs, the trial transcript, and the relevant case law, this Court concludes that it must grant the defendants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In December, 1978, the plaintiff, Eduardo De La Maria, engaged defendant Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, (Powell, Goldstein), to render certain legal services to him in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Berman v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Rogers v. NorvellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Kushner v. McLartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Parsons v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dalo v. KivitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hays v. Page Perry, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. Hays v. Page Perry, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  4. Rice v. PoppeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API