Legal Opinion
Licoho Enterprises, Inc. v. Succession of Champagne
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided September 24, 1973No. 53149PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
283 So.2d 217 (1973)
LICOHO ENTERPRISES, INC.
v.
SUCCESSION of Herbert CHAMPAGNE.
No. 53149.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
September 24, 1973.
Gerald H. Schiff, Sandoz, Sandoz & Schiff, Opelousas, for plaintiff-applicant.
Minos H. Armentor, Armentor & Wattigny, New Iberia, for defendant-respondent.
BARHAM, Justice.
On February 22, 1968, Herbert Champagne, now deceased, executed a demand note payable to Warren J. Moity for $75,000.00 plus 8 per cent interest from date and thirty-three and one-third per cent (331/3%) attorney's fees. The note was subsequently transferred by Moity to Licoho Enterprises,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bruno v. OviattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- Caldwell v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Licoho Enterprises, Inc. v. Succession of ChampagneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frisard v. AutinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Smith v. Baton Rouge Bank & Trust CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- WellTech, Inc. v. AbadieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Duggan v. Bossier Federal Credit UnionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- O'QUIN v. Kinder Paint Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.