Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Oviatt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 13, 1896No. 11,937PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Oivil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the' court was delivered by

Miller, J.

The plaintiff sues to revive a judgment against defendant. The answer is that there was no consideration for the note of twenty-five hundred dollars, on which the judgment is based; that it was pledged by her for another note for five hundred dollars she was induced to sign; that the pledgee sold and purchased the twenty-five hundred dollar note, transferring it to plaintiff, who sued and recovered upon it the judgment sought to be revived; that the suit on the note was not defended; that she employed no counsel, but that such employment was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olden v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nethken v. NethkenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  3. Roach v. PearlLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Krause v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Pollock v. TALCO MIDSTREAM ASSETS, LTD.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API