Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1946No. 6201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

In the area where the accident herein involved occurred, the Southwestern Gas and Electric Company, hereafter styled Electric Company, maintained an electric high-line that crossed over and above a telephone line, owned, maintained and operated by Humble Oil and Refining Company, herein styled Humble.

Howard Stewart, employed by Humble as a switcher, resided with his family in a pumper’s cottage on the leasehold furnished by Humble, within which a telephone installed by the latter had been connected with above telephone line. On the morning of and about the time of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barrington v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. ColeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Blaugrund v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Estep v. BrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Hudson v. West Central Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Masterson v. State Ex Rel. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API