Legal Opinion

Trees Oil Co. v. State Corp. Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 18, 2005No. 91,733PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

This is an administrative appeal pursuant to K.S.A. 77-601 et seq. from the decision of the district court of Haskell County, Kansas, affirming the order of the State Corporation Commission of Kansas (KCC or Commission) granting the application of Chesapeake Operating Inc. (Chesapeake) to allow the compulsory unitization and unit operation of the South Eubank Water-flood Unit (Unit) pursuant to the Kansas Unitization Act, K.S.A. 55-1301 et seq., over the continuing objection of The Trees Oil Company (Trees).

The first issue was one of first impression…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Oshman Sporting Goods Co. KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. GT, Kansas, L.L.C. v. Riley County Register of DeedsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Frick Farm Properties, L.P. v. State, Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. McIntosh v. Sedgwick CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Rural Water Dist. No. 4 v. City of Eudora, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. In Re the Appeal of Director of Property ValuationSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API