Richmond Sanitary Co. v. Franklin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
From an order granting a nonsuit in favor of the owner in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien the plaintiff has appealed.
As stated in the plaintiff’s opening brief and conceded in defendant’s brief, the appeal involves only one question, which is: “. . . whether or not there is a material variance between the pleading of the contract and the proof thereof and also whether or not there is a material variance between the contract set up in the notice of lien and the contract attempted to be proven at the trial”. However, the defendant adverts to the fact that there was no proof that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Star Mill and Lumber Co. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Jarvis v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Acme Lumber Co. v. WesslingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Callahan v. Chatsworth Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Shafer v. Los Serranos Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932