Legal Opinion
Howell v. Hodap
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 12, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0027PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 Robert Howell ,and Pete Hodap bring separate appeals related to a civil suit alleging multiple constitutional and tort violations arising out of the execution of a search warrant. Patti Howell and Randy Johnson submit cross-appeals. For the following reasons and those set forth in the simultaneously filed memorandum decision, 1 we affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
¶ 2 On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at about 6:30 in the morning, several officers with Prescott Area Narcotics Task Force (“PANT”), 2 including Pete Hodap and Randy Johnson, arrived at Robert and Patti…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Manuel Davila v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Kolela Mpoyo v. Litton Electro-Optical SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Frank v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lindsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Marika Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson, Az, Llc,...william AmoureuxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Bishara v. US BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Frenci v. Rush Auto Corporation LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Liberty Corporate Capital Limited v. SteiglemanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.