Legal Opinion

Clovsky v. Stanley VV.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), entered August 8, 1990, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, to adjudicate respondent as the father of a child born to Catherine WW.

Respondent failed to object to the admission into evidence of the human leucocyte antigen blood test. However, he now claims that it was not properly received into evidence. In view of the fact that at the time of the test’s admission respondent affirmatively stated that he had "no objection”, he should not now be permitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beaudoin v. David RR.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Kimiecik v. Daryl E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Ryan ex rel. Bonnie A. v. Paul B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Darla E. v. Barry F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Commissioner of Social Services v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Andre v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API