Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eickenroth v. Roosen, Varchetti & Oliver, PLLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 2021No. 4:20-cv-11647Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CANDY EICKENROTH AND Case No. 20-11647 DAMIAN EICKENROTH, Stephanie Dawkins Davis Plaintiffs, United States District Judge v. ROOSEN, VARCHETTI & OLIVIER, PLLC, Defendant. ___________________________ / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 10) AND TERMINATING PENDING MOTION AS MOOT (ECF No. 9) I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs, Candy and Damian Eickenroth, filed this lawsuit against the law firm of Roosen, Varchetti & Olivier, PLLC on June 23, 2020. (ECF No. 1).1 Plaintiffs assert violations of the Fair…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API