Trinidad v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
Appellant, George Trinidad (“Trinidad”), appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. In his sole point of error, Trinidad contends the trial court erred in refusing to issue a writ of attachment for two subpoenaed witnesses who failed to appear in court. We agree that the trial court reversibly erred in denying the attachment; therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for a new trial.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Trinidad’s trial in the lower court commenced on July 15, 1996. At the end of the second day of trial, Trinidad’s counsel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Erwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Brito v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- George v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rodela v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sturgeon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Craig Michael Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Gerald Mac Lowrey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
- Jimmie Doyle Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
- Jimmie Doyle Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.