Legal Opinion

State v. Laramore

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 2007No. 33041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

In this appeal from a judgment of conviction for attempted strangulation, we are called upon to determine whether the statute under which the defendant was convicted was facially void for vagueness and whether the jury instruction defining “reasonable doubt” lessened the State’s burden of proof and thereby violated the defendant’s right to due process.

Jerry Wayne Laramore was charged with attempted strangulation in violation of Idaho Code § 18-923. The information alleged that he committed the crime against a woman with whom Laramore was in a dating relationship. Laramore filed…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. Michael Jay FreitasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. Robert Michael WillistonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API