Legal Opinion
Andrew Wann v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 5, 2013No. 32A01-1303-CR-123PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Andrew Wann (“Wann”) appeals an order revoking his probation and ordering that he serve 90 days of a 365-day suspended sentence. We affirm.
Issues
Wann presents two issues for review:
I. Whether the trial court admitted a urinalysis report in violation of Wann’s due process rights as a probationer; and
II. Whether the order that he serve 90 days of his suspended sentence contravenes statutory authority.
Facts and Procedural History
On November 10, 2009, Wann pled guilty to Possession of Marijuana, as a Class A misdemeanor. He was sentenced to 365 days of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Reyes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Holmes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Christopher Bell, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- David J. Taylor v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Elizabeth Benham v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- James Shead, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2021
- Kevin A. Deubner v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.