Legal Opinion

Reyes v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2007No. 01S02-0612-CR-495PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Courts have adopted two principal methods for determining the admissibility of hearsay evidence in probation revocation hearings: a “balancing test” that weighs the probationer’s interest in confronting the declarant against the State’s interest in not producing same; and a “substantial trustworthiness test” that determines the reliability of the evidence. For the reasons set forth in this decision, we adopt the substantial trustworthiness test.

Background

In 1998, a jury found Defendant George Reyes guilty of aggravated battery. Reyes’s original sentence was corrected in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. United States v. Shauntel Martin, Also Known as BooCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Monroe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Figures v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Holmes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Gosha v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API