Legal Opinion

Henry Maillard, Inc. v. Gildenberg

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 10, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The facts are conceded. December 24, 1938, the judgment creditor obtained an order requiring the judgment debtor to appear for examination in supplementary proceedings. December 30, 1938, the debtor appeared, was examined, and the examination was closed, but no order was entered thereon, in any way vacating the injunction clause not to transfer or dispose of property contained in the order for the examination of the judgment debtor. At the time the order was obtained-and the examination conducted, and closed, the debtor owned a claim for $502 against the Crestón Drug Co., Inc. On January 3,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laird v. . CartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Kommel v. KarronCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  3. Braun v. KorostoffNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wood v. SchwartzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API