Braun v. Korostoff
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
Motion to punish judgment debtor for contempt, in that he violated an injunctive order heretofore entered herein. The judgment debtor contends that the amendment in 1935 fChap. 630) adding section 799 of the Civil Practice Act is inapplicable to supplementary proceedings on a judgment obtained before the amendment took effect. That amendment extended the injunctive power of the court in supplementary proceedings so as to affect property acquired after the order. The amendment, if applied to a judgment granted before the amendment took effect, would give to the judgment creditor a remedy for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Lazarus v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- O'Reilly v. Utah, N. & C. Stage Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
- Isola v. . WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henry Maillard, Inc. v. GildenbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939