Legal Opinion

People v. Hilton

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Seymour Rotker, J.

Issue Presented

The case presents a question of apparent first impression in this State:1 Does the doctrine of collateral estoppel prevent the People from continued criminal prosecution of a defendant who has been the subject of a full hearing regarding his violation of probation for the very same acts underlying one count of a new indictment against him and where the court presiding over such revocation hearing finds that the People have failed to prove those acts by a preponderance of the evidence?

For the reasons indicated below, the court finds that the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Ex Parte TarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. McGrath v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Banks v. PersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  3. People v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API