Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Rybert
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 12, 1933No. 22349PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. One wlio signs a note ostensibly as a coprincipal may in fact be a surety, and this may be established by parol. If he is a surety he may, after paying- the amount due by the principal, recover it in a suit against the principal, either in a suit upon the note after a transfer, or upon an obligation of the defendant arising otherwise. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3541, 3552, 3556; Trammell v. Swift Fertilizer Works, 121 Ga. 778 (49 S. E. 739) ; Hardy v. Boyer, 7 Ga. App. 472 (67 S. E. 205) ; Jones v. Norton, 9 Ga. App. 333 (71 S. E. 687) ; Baggs v. Funderburke, 11 Ga. App. 173 (74 S. E. 937) ;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baggs v. FunderburkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Trammell v. Swift Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Duckett v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Jones v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Travis v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lamis v. CallianosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Levinson v. American Thermex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- In re SeigelDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1942
- Lincoln Discount Corp. v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Richards v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.